Sunday, July 12, 2020

PictureCorrect: 3 Tips to Add Depth to Your Landscape Composition

The importance of composition in photography can’t be understated. If you want to quickly improve your photography, the best way is to work on your composition. But that said, composition – especially when photographing landscapes – comes with its own set of challenges. For instance, a big challenge is to capture a three-dimensional world in a two-dimensional medium. How do you convey depth with photography? In this video, landscape photographer Mark Dunney shares three tips to help you overcome this challenge:

Capturing a sense of depth in your images makes it visually engaging. Viewers get drawn into the image and they get a sense of being right there when the image was being taken.

One of the basic ways you can create depth in your images is by including layers in your composition. Don’t just compose with what you feel is interesting, also try and include some context. And a great way to this is by adding foreground, midground, and background. This creates a path for the eyes to visually travel through the image.

“Whenever I think of foreground, midground, background, that midground layer’s purpose for me is to separate the foreground from the background.”

Another common approach that you can use to add depth is to include leading lines. They can be in the form of rivers, a path, or even some repeating patterns. They do a great job of drawing the viewers right into the image.

Also, try framing up what you want to shoot using some natural elements. See how you can use trees, branches, or even landscapes to create a window for the viewers to look through. This furthers creates an immersive experience while adding depth to the image.

What other ways do you use to add depth to your images?

For further training: The Landscape Photography Recipe Cards at 64% Off

Go to full article: 3 Tips to Add Depth to Your Landscape Composition

What are your thoughts on this article? Join the discussion on Facebook

PictureCorrect subscribers can also learn more today with our #1 bestseller: The Photography Tutorial eBook

The post 3 Tips to Add Depth to Your Landscape Composition appeared first on PictureCorrect.

from PictureCorrect

Saturday, July 11, 2020 Smoke Art Photography Tips, Tricks and Tutorials

Here we have collected some amazing tutorials, videos, and photo galleries about Smoke Art photography.

Smoke Photography Tips, Tutorials and Videos

#1 Capturing The Smoke – Amazing Smoke Photography Tutorial

Everyone has seen smoke in various forms. For some, smoke is an allergy and for some, smoke is an inspiration. If you belong to the latter category, welcome to the world of smoke photography.

Click here to read Smoke Photography Tutorial

#2 How to Photograph Smoke – Step-by-Step Tutorial

Smoke photography can be extremely frustrating yet fulfilling at the same time. It all depends on how you approach the subject. If you have spare time and/or stuck indoors on a rainy day, then it’s the perfect opportunity to try the technique.

Click here to read Step by Step Tutorial

#3 How To Capture a Stylish Smoke Photograph

Today we’re going to delve into the arena of smoke photography, investigate some of the post-processing techniques available to you, as well as a few different methods for obtaining certain effects. Grab your camera, and join us after the jump!

Click here to read Smoke Photography Tutorial

#4 Smoking Permitted: An Interview with Photographer Graham Jeffery on Smoke Photography

Who would have thought that combining an incense stick, black velvet, a dark room, and the camera could result in some of the most amazing and creative images ever to be seen?

Click here to read Smoke Photography Interview

#5 Smoke Photography Photoshop Tutorial

In this tutorial, I will show you how to process your smoke photographs using Photoshop. This is a follow up to the tutorial on How to Photograph Smoke – Step-by-Step Tutorial. If you want to know how to photograph smoke.

Click here to learn Smoke Photography Photoshop Tutorial Here

#6 Sensitive Light

This is one of the more recent single plume pictures taken early in 2010. If you can recognize a shape in the smoke or can think of a better name for the picture (shouldn’t be hard) then feel free to leave a comment for us all to enjoy.

Click here to visit Smoke Art Gallery

#7 Smoke Trail Art in Flickr

An Amazing Flickr Gallery by Will Cook Photography

Click here to visit Smoke Art Gallery Set in Flickr

#8 Art Smoke Group in Flickr

Flickr Group for Smoke Art Photography.

Click here to visit Art Smoke Group Pool in Flickr

Smoke Art Photography Videos

Don’t miss to check our previous related articles :


PetaPixel: Does Micro Four Thirds Have a Future in Photography?

The photography industry has been shrinking and the COVID-19 pandemic has not made things any better. This smaller market is being shared by the same number of companies, which could mean some huge changes for the industry. As formats go, Micro Four Thirds isn’t looking strong through this time.

Every so often we tend to see posts about how such-and-such a company is going to die, and nothing happens. Pentax is a perfect example of this. Every year seems to be described as the year of its demise, yet it continues. Ricoh has even released new lenses recently, which has seemingly dispelled some of the fears for the company. Based on this, it would seem odd that I’m writing an article discussing Micro Four Thirds with the same doom and gloom angle.

Well, the reason is that this pandemic has had somewhat of an unprecedented impact on many industries. Companies like Olympus started off by exiting the South Korean market and more recently, Olympus announced it was exiting the camera industry as a whole.

What’s worse is that this doesn’t come as a surprise. Many people were expecting this, and it felt as though it was only a matter of time. This is bad for the industry at large, and the question that comes to mind for many is whether Micro Four Thirds as a format can survive.

The Fall of Olympus

For 84 years, Olympus produced brilliant cameras that garnered a strong following. The last 5 years have not been kind to the industry and unfortunately, it was too much for the company. Sales have been dropping year on year and losses continued to mount. This current pandemic exacerbated the situation and ultimately led the company to sell off its camera division. Chances are, this would have happened regardless of the pandemic and COVID-19 simply sped up the process.

The main issue with Olympus was that it offered cameras that only appealed to an exceedingly small sector of the market. The photography industry is (relatively speaking) a pretty niche industry already, and it is tough to be a niche within a niche.

The other problem with Olympus was that the unique selling proposition (USP) it offered simply wasn’t compelling enough. In my discussions with both the customers and the company, they described IBIS and the small lightweight body as their main selling points. Both those features are useful but ultimately, insignificant.

The main reason I say this is because there are plenty of options available that people could comfortably describe as better than what Olympus has. Consider the Olympus E-M 1 Mark III. This camera is priced at $1,599 and that’s after a rebate. Cameras like the $1,499 Fujifilm X-T3 are far better values mostly because they’re less expensive, offer more notable features, and have a much larger sensor.

The Olympus E-M 1 Mark III

Sony also has a number of less expensive APS-C cameras available and for many consumers, the few minor benefits that Olympus offered just weren’t enough.

The biggest problem with Olympus was that it didn’t focus a great deal on video, and that’s where companies like Panasonic truly excelled for a long time. The Panasonic GH5, for example, was one of the very first few cameras on the market that offered 4K 60p at an affordable price point. In fact, even now I can’t find a single Olympus camera with video features that can compete with the GH5 or the Fujifilm X-T3.

If you’re a photographer in the market for a new camera, it’s difficult to recommend an Olympus. The issue is that for many people, the difference in image quality is tough to swallow, especially considering the prices of competing options.

Essentially, Olympus cameras cost more to offer lesser image quality and most consumers just didn’t see the benefit. This is not to say that Olympus cameras are not worth buying because they are brilliant. Market perception, however, can be tough to shake.

Transition to Full-Frame

When Panasonic moved over to full-frame, many people wondered if Olympus was going to do the same. Many people also wondered about the future of the format and assumed that Panasonic will eventually stop producing new Micro Four Thirds products.

This makes sense — as a company, it would be more effective for Panasonic to concentrate its efforts on one format, and it seems full-frame is the one they have picked.

When I asked Olympus the question last year in March, it reconfirmed its commitment to Micro Four Thirds. In hindsight, it seems that maybe the company didn’t want to invest more into the photography industry. The main problem is that even if Olympus did decide to move over to full-frame, what would it actually offer?

As a company it doesn’t have a long history in video, so that wouldn’t have been a great option. If it’s wildlife and action, then it already has that covered with its current line of cameras and lenses. Canon and Nikon already dominate this sector for full-frame. Unfortunately for the company, it just didn’t have anything compelling enough to offer by moving to the larger format.

The Formats Future with Photographers

The number of cameras being sold worldwide peaked in 2010. Since then, the industry has seen sales figures drop year on year. Many of us assume that this is because the industry is in decline and that smartphones have caused it.

What it seems like to me is that the photography industry has become a little too bloated. There are too many manufacturers and too many great options on the market for customers to choose from. I don’t think the photography industry is in decline as such — instead, it’s self-correcting.

There are two reasons why I think this. The first is that the market for professionals remains largely unchanged. Sales of cameras with interchangeable lenses have not declined anywhere near as much as cameras with fixed lenses. Sales are returning to the figures we had in 1999; around the time when digital was first taking off. This surge in sales could simply be a digital bubble.

Many companies grew in size along with the industry and when sales numbers started dropping, some companies just couldn’t react fast enough. We now have too many options in a market that’s still shrinking from its peak. Something has to give, and it seems Micro Four Thirds is the likely victim.

For photographers, there are lots of better options available at similar price points and for most us, Micro Four Thirds does not offer anything significant. The IBIS features and longer reach with lenses are useful, but only to a small minority. Ultimately, I think the days for this format are numbered when it comes to photographers.

Why Micro Four Thirds Is Not Doomed

There is one area where this format could thrive, and that is video. The video camera industry hasn’t struggled in the same way that the photography industry has. There is still a healthy demand for cameras with the Micro Four Thirds sensor.

For one, the smaller sensor can allow for faster frame rates, without generating as much heat as larger formats do. This is why cameras like the Panasonic GH5 did so well and continue to be popular among videographers.

The second big reason is IBIS. For photographers, built-in stabilization is mildly useful in comparison to what it offers videographers. In general, smaller sensors tend to have much better built-in stabilization features. This is why action cameras like GoPro, no longer require gimbals in order to produce smooth footage. With further developments in this area, we could see Micro Four Thirds cameras with similarly performing IBIS; giving them a powerful advantage over larger sensor cameras.

There several other benefits of the format too like the lens mount, but what I think is important to note is that this format is probably not going anywhere anytime soon. Even if Panasonic stops developing high-end cameras for the format, other manufacturers will certainly take its place. We’re already seeing how Sharp is planning on releasing an 8K camera of its own. For that reason, as a format, I think it still has lots of life ahead.

Final Thoughts

It is upsetting to see a fine company such as Olympus having to sell off its camera division. Despite this, these tough times may provide some useful lessons for the industry. Companies may start focusing their efforts where it counts, and the competition could be beneficial to the end consumers.

Ultimately, although the format may not continue to hold a prominent position in the photography industry, I think Micro Four Thirds will continue to thrive in the video industry. These types of cameras offer a great deal of value, which could be difficult to match with larger sensor cameras.

About the author: Usman Dawood is the lead photographer of Sonder Creative, an architectural and interior photography company. The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. You can find more of Dawood’s work on his website, Instagram, and YouTube.

from PetaPixel

PetaPixel: This Guy Wore a Face Camera for a Year and Built a VR Time Machine

San Francisco-based inventor Lucas Rizzotto spent all of 2019 wearing cameras on his face. He then built a virtual reality time machine that lets him relive any memory from the year by simply punching in a date and time.

Rizzotto shows how the project was done in the 28-minute video above, which exaggerates some aspects of the project for comedic/dramatic effect (and warning: there’s some strong language). Here’s an 18-second video showing the gist of how the time machine works:

Rizzotto wore Snapchat Spectacles, glasses that use two cameras to record 1216×1216 footage at 60fps in stereoscopic 3D.

After filling up a mountain of hard drives with his life footage, Rizzotto had to code up a virtual reality control panel for the time machine, a system that can quickly retrieve any memory based on timestamp, and special effects for displaying the retrieved memories in a cool way.

It took quite a bit of work and troubleshooting, but Rizzotto ended up successfully creating a slick time machine that he interacts with using a VR headset. Once he selects the destination date and time with the machine’s buttons, he pulls a lever and is presented with a large portal that plays what he was seeing at that specific time.

“It’s really hard to describe the feeling you get reliving your own past,” Rizzotto says in the video. “It doesn’t feel like watching a video — not at all. In fact, the moment you see through your eyes again, your brain lights up and you remember everything connected to that moment. You don’t just see the memory portal, you see everything around it. Like the rush of memories you get when you smell food you used to eat as a child.

“It’s crazy, overwhelming, emotional, and way more immersive than I thought it would be. I was my own ghost, watching myself wander through life with no idea of what was going to happen next.”

Back around 2012, there were a number of wearable “lifelogging” cameras (e.g. Autographer and Memoto) that promised a similar concept of reliving any of your memories. Those projects never achieved any commercial success or widespread usage, but it’ll be interesting to see whether improvements in camera technology and memory reliving (e.g. using VR) could lead to a viable commercial product sometime in the future.

from PetaPixel

PetaPixel: The Camera-Obsessed Man Who Lives in a Camera-Shaped House

In the Indian city of Belgaum, there’s a man who loves cameras so much that he built a 3-story camera-shaped house. Not only that, but he also named his three sons Canon, Nikon, and Epson.

49-year-old professional photographer Ravi Hongal spent over $94,000 building his unusual dwelling, which features a lens, flash, film reels, memory card, and viewfinder on its facade. The inner rooms are reportedly camera-themed as well.

The house is so bizarre-looking that it has become something of a tourist attraction in Hongal’s town. It would also be a perfect building to turn into a working giant camera.

(via Laughing Squid and All About Belgaum)

from PetaPixel
via IFTTT Good Photographs Are Come With Your Eyes, Brain, And Heart: Master Photographer Fan Ho Interview

Fan Ho (1931–2016) is a China-born photographer, film director, and actor. He spent his early years in Shanghai, where he began taking photographs after receiving his first camera at the age of fourteen. He moved to Hong Kong in 1949, and from the 1950s onwards gained considerable attention for his striking photographs of everyday life in Hong Kong.

This is a four-minute video, but his words are very insightful. Please see the video and inspire yourself. Click on the Caption for Subtitles in English.

I really like these below words from this interview.

“I prefer black and white photographs, it’s not that I don’t take color photographs. Colors do not fit well in my world, black and white offer me a distance. A kind of distance from real life, I think this distance is very important. Real-life is multicolor black and white offers a sense of detachment it allows audiences and viewers to develop their responses and offers the space and depth to ponder and contemplate my ideas.”

“Good photographs are not taken with the camera. They come with your eyes, your brain, your heart, and not with some piece of equipment.”

We are sharing this video from M Plus Youtube Channel. Follow their channel for more amazing videos.

You can find more info about Fan Ho


PetaPixel: Zooming Video Shows How Impressive the First Black Hole Photo Was

In 2019, researchers made international headlines by releasing the world’s first photo of a black hole. Here’s a 1-minute video that zooms from the night sky into that black hole image to show how impressive the achievement was.

“The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) — a planet-scale array of eight ground-based radio telescopes forged through international collaboration — was designed to capture images of a black hole,” writes the European Southern Observatory (ESO), which released the video. “This zoom video starts with a view of ALMA and zooms in on the heart of M87, showing successively more detailed observations and culminating in the first direct visual evidence of a supermassive black hole’s shadow.”

The video starts with a view of the night sky as seen from Earth. Still frame by ESO.
The video ends with the first photo ever shot of a black hole. Image by Event Horizon Telescope (EHT).

To capture the photo, scientists created an Earth-sized “computational telescope” that gathered data from 8 sites around the globe and used algorithms to extrapolate and fill in the missing pieces.

The black hole shadow seen in the first picture is about 40 microarcseconds wide. Shooting a picture of it is like trying to photograph a quarter in Los Angeles from Washington, DC or an orange on the moon from Earth.

from PetaPixel